WATCH: B.C.’s legislature was at the centre of controversy yet again today, but this time it had nothing to do with politics. The issue at hand? The dress code and the right to “bare arms”.
A dress code protest at British Columbia’s legislature that prompted some women to roll up their sleeves in solidarity on Thursday has resulted in the Speaker’s office ordering a review of modern dress expectations at the building.
Acting clerk Kate Ryan-Lloyd said Speaker Darryl Plecas directed her to review the legislature’s dress code policy to determine what is considered appropriate business attire for women. She said the current policy dates back to 1980.
“The phrase contemporary conservative dress has been the standard here for many, many years, but of course business attire evolves over time,” she said. “We will be undertaking a review of the dress code to ensure that it meets modern business attire expectations.”
The review comes after at least seven female legislature journalists and one NDP staff official wore short-sleeved attire in defiance of the dress code.
Do we look unprofessional to you? Women in the @BCLegislature are being told our bare arms are unprofessional, do not constitute proper business attire for the halls of the House #bcpoli pic.twitter.com/1lJSWngP34
— Shannon Waters (@sobittersosweet) March 28, 2019
Female journalists going sleeveless as they interview @carolejames about bare arm controversy at the #BCLeg. FYI James pointed out the top under her jacket has no sleeves. @CHEK_News pic.twitter.com/LNihPrGKMi
— April Lawrence (@AprilCHEK) March 28, 2019
A stupid, ridiculous, arcane interpretation of out-of-date 'appropriate attire' rules for women at the #bcleg that shouldn't exist — yet for for some incomprehensible reason are suddenly being enforced by stickler sergeant-at-arms staff in the hallways.
— Rob Shaw (@robshaw_vansun) March 28, 2019
Several members of the government’s staff said they were approached recently by sergeant-at-arms staff and advised it’s against the rules to wear short-sleeved clothes in the legislature and were told to cover up.
Finance Minister Carole James said a dress code review at the legislature is long overdue.
“I think it’s ridiculous we have people policing that,” said James. “People are adults in this place. They understand it’s a professional environment and dress accordingly.'”
She said she regularly wears pants and comfortable shoes to the legislature because pants are more comfortable during days that involve moving from office to office. James said she does not wear high heels because she has long-term issues with her ankles and feet.
James said she was wearing a sleeveless blouse under her blazer.
Last year, the legislature unanimously supported allowing politicians to bring their babies into the chamber during debates.
“When I was first elected, we were still dealing with converting some of the washrooms to women’s washrooms,” said James.
Sonia Furstenau, a Green member of the legislature, said on Twitter that one of her staff was recently told by a member of the legislature staff to wear a slip under her dress because it was clinging to her legs as she walked.
“The women in this building are here to work, not dress for outdated rules,” she tweeted.
Acting sergeant-at-arms Randy Ennis said members of his staff have been enforcing the decades-old business attire policy and telling women to cover up.
“It goes back to what would be suitable for MLAs to be wearing in the chamber, the female staff or female members of the assembly,” he said.
The dress policy from 1980 states that business attire generally constitutes layered clothing that includes covered shoulders.
“For an individual who identifies as a woman, this would typically include a business suit, dress with sleeves, or a skirt with a sweater or blouse; jackets or cardigans are not necessarily required,” the policy states.
It also states “for an individual who identifies as a man, this would typically include a collared dressed shirt and tie, dress pants or kilt, and a suit jacket.”
Reporter Shannon Waters said she and her female colleagues decided to challenge the dress code after hearing about a senior NDP staff official who was told her short-sleeved shirt was not appropriate for the legislature.
“We don’t have a problem with there being a dress code and us dressing professionally,” said Waters, who works for the online publication BC Today. “What we are frustrated with is sort of an arbitrary enforcement or arbitrary interpretation by staff in this building about what does not constitute professional dress for women.”
The office of the sergeant-at-arms recently circulated a media conduct brochure that said men must wear shirts and ties but made no mention of a dress code for women.
Story by Dirk Meissner, The Canadian Press
BC Today journalist Shannon Waters posted this photo on Twitter of journalists and staff wearing short sleeves. (Shannon Waters/Twitter)[/capt